[mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change

[Steven Oyanagi]

Hi,

OK - I did not.  I seem to remember, however, when I looked at some of the
earlier mods (like yours) that those mods just put in “MPI “.  I did note
that some commit comment said something about “\MPI/“, which is why I
asked.  I can go back and change them.

Also - should we be using a fork for the working group rather than the
master repository?  That’s what the MPI Forum instructions seem to
indicate.
	- Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM
To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change

>Steve,
>
>You should use \MPI/ in latex.
>
>  -- Pavan
>
>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message.  Changes were made per the
>>review
>> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings.  My
>> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard.
>>Did I
>> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted?  I
>>just
>> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases.  MPI isn’t some special tag
>> that has be denoted in an different way, is it?
>> 	- Steve
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM
>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to
>>>the
>>> branch.  Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a
>>>glance
>>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something.  I assume in
>>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process.  Was I suppose
>>>to
>>> do anything else?
>>> 
>>> Please let me know if further changes are needed.
>>> 	- Steve
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM
>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then
>>>> will
>>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning.  Hope that’s soon enough
>>>> for
>>>> you folks.
>>>> 	- Steve
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on behalf
>>>>of
>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org"
>>>><mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM
>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>>> 
>>>>> Steve,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks.  If you are unable to push the changes in due to access
>>>>>regions,
>>>>> you can send your patch to me.  I'll apply it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- Pavan
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Pavan,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes.  I had
>>>>>> problems
>>>>>> finding the repositories until I
>>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them.  Since then I ran
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> of time to work on the changes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly.
>>>>>> Most
>>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To”
>>>>>> field.
>>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message.  I
>>>>>> think
>>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be
>>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org”.
>>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.”
>>>>>> part.
>>>>>> 	- Steve
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on
>>>>>>behalf
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org"
>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM
>>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for
>>>>>>> pages
>>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your
>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> git.  Did you commit your changes in?  If not, can you please
>>>>>>>commit
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification`
>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>> on git at github.com:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- Pavan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>