[mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change

Balaji, Pavan balaji at anl.gov
Wed Jun 8 14:28:17 CDT 2016


Steve,

You should use \MPI/ in latex.

  -- Pavan

> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message.  Changes were made per the review
> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings.  My
> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard. Did I
> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted?  I just
> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases.  MPI isn’t some special tag
> that has be denoted in an different way, is it?
> 	- Steve
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM
> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to the
>> branch.  Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a glance
>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something.  I assume in
>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process.  Was I suppose to
>> do anything else?
>> 
>> Please let me know if further changes are needed.
>> 	- Steve
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM
>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then
>>> will
>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning.  Hope that’s soon enough
>>> for
>>> you folks.
>>> 	- Steve
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on behalf of
>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM
>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>> 
>>>> Steve,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.  If you are unable to push the changes in due to access regions,
>>>> you can send your patch to me.  I'll apply it.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field.
>>>> 
>>>> -- Pavan
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Pavan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes.  I had
>>>>> problems
>>>>> finding the repositories until I
>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them.  Since then I ran
>>>>> out
>>>>> of time to work on the changes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly.
>>>>> Most
>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To”
>>>>> field.
>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to
>>>>> the
>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message.  I
>>>>> think
>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be
>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org”.
>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.”
>>>>> part.
>>>>> 	- Steve
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on behalf
>>>>> of
>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org"
>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM
>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for
>>>>>> pages
>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your
>>>>>> changes
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> git.  Did you commit your changes in?  If not, can you please commit
>>>>>> them
>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification`
>>>>>> branch
>>>>>> on git at github.com:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- Pavan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm




More information about the mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list