[mpiwg-hybridpm] Changes to the EI chapter

[Balaji, Pavan]

Thanks.  Jim/Jeff/Aurelien?

> On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> I agree that this sentence should not be in the standard.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan.
> 
> On 03/03/2015 14:24, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
>> The Forum was not entirely happy with the chapter committee change on the EI chapter.  Specifically, the following sentence that was added into the pdf should be removed:
>> 
>> "Implementations that do not support threads are not required to support the calling of these functions from threads."
>> 
>> This is in direct contradiction to the fact that the mentioned functions should work correctly without knowing whether threads are there or not.  I plan to remove it.  Please let me know what you think.
>> 
>>   -- Pavan
>> 
>> --
>> Pavan Balaji  ✉️
>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> 
> -- 
> Dan Holmes
> Applications Consultant in HPC Research
> EPCC, The University of Edinburgh
> James Clerk Maxwell Building
> The Kings Buildings
> Peter Guthrie Tait Road
> Edinburgh
> EH9 3FD
> T: +44(0)131 651 3465
> E: dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk
> 
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
> 
> 
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

--
Pavan Balaji  ✉️
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji