[mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

[Steven Oyanagi]

Never mind, I see the reminder for today’s meeting now.  For some reason
my mailer didn’t display Jim and Pavan’s e-mail messages until after I
send my message below.

Sorry for the spam.
	- Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
Date: Monday, January 12, 2015 at 10:45 AM
To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

>Hi,
>
>It’s January and time for the telecom.  Are we meeting today?
>	- Steve
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: <Balaji>, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov>
>Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
><mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>Date: Monday, December 15, 2014 at 5:17 PM
>To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
><mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
>
>>
>>I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email
>>till very late.  Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays.
>>Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January?
>>
>>  -- Pavan
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss.  Otherwise, I'll drop by
>>>quarter past the hour.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes
>>>incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF.  I'm happy
>>>to meet to review these, if folks want to.  One item that bears
>>>discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations
>>>to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different
>>>processes.
>>> 
>>>  ~Jim.
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>>> Jim,
>>> 
>>> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the
>>>endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time?
>>> 
>>> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you
>>>are not ready yet.
>>> 
>>> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators
>>>proposal.  At least enough to encourage me to pursue it.  I'm going to
>>>take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation
>>>experience before bringing it back up again.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>>   -- Pavan
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>
>>--
>>Pavan Balaji  ✉️
>>http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>