[mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

Steven Oyanagi sko at cray.com
Mon Jan 12 10:45:23 CST 2015


Hi,

It’s January and time for the telecom.  Are we meeting today?
	- Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: <Balaji>, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov>
Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Date: Monday, December 15, 2014 at 5:17 PM
To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

>
>I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email
>till very late.  Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays.
>Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January?
>
>  -- Pavan
>
>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380.
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss.  Otherwise, I'll drop by
>>quarter past the hour.
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes
>>incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF.  I'm happy
>>to meet to review these, if folks want to.  One item that bears
>>discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations
>>to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different
>>processes.
>> 
>>  ~Jim.
>> 
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>> Jim,
>> 
>> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the
>>endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time?
>> 
>> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you
>>are not ready yet.
>> 
>> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators
>>proposal.  At least enough to encourage me to pursue it.  I'm going to
>>take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation
>>experience before bringing it back up again.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>>   -- Pavan
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>
>--
>Pavan Balaji  ✉️
>http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm



More information about the mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list