[mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

[Jeff Hammond]

You mean MPI isn't so much fun that Cray people do it on vacation?

:-)

Jeff

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If there is a meeting on 12/29, most likely no one from Cray will attend.
> That meeting falls during Cray's week long holiday shutdown.
>         - Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM
> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon
>
>>That's fine by me.
>>
>>On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Balaji, Pavan
>><balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>
>>I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email
>>till very late.  Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays.
>>Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January?
>>
>>  -- Pavan
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss.  Otherwise, I'll drop by
>>>quarter past the hour.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes
>>>incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF.  I'm happy
>>>to meet to review these, if folks want to.  One item that bears
>>>discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare
>> operations to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to
>>different processes.
>>>
>>>  ~Jim.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>>> Jim,
>>>
>>> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the
>>>endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time?
>>>
>>> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you
>>>are not ready yet.
>>>
>>> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators
>>>proposal.  At least enough to encourage me to pursue it.  I'm going to
>>>take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation
>>>experience before bringing it back up again.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>   -- Pavan
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>>
>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>>
>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Pavan Balaji  ✉️
>>http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm



-- 
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/