[mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

[Steven Oyanagi]

Hi,

If there is a meeting on 12/29, most likely no one from Cray will attend.
That meeting falls during Cray's week long holiday shutdown.
	- Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 8:46 AM
To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

>That's fine by me.
>
>On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Balaji, Pavan
><balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>
>I think people assumed it wasn't happening because there wasn't any email
>till very late.  Unfortunately, the next call is during the holidays.
>Shall we cancel that call and meet again in January?
>
>  -- Pavan
>
>> On Dec 15, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Also, the PDF with feedback is now attached the trac ticket #380.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss.  Otherwise, I'll drop by
>>quarter past the hour.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes
>>incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF.  I'm happy
>>to meet to review these, if folks want to.  One item that bears
>>discussion is the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare
> operations to result in MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to
>different processes.
>>
>>  ~Jim.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>> Jim,
>>
>> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the
>>endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time?
>>
>> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you
>>are not ready yet.
>>
>> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators
>>proposal.  At least enough to encourage me to pursue it.  I'm going to
>>take it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation
>>experience before bringing it back up again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>   -- Pavan
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> 
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> 
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>
>
>
>--
>Pavan Balaji  ✉️
>http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>
>
>
>
>