[mpiwg-hybridpm] Hybrid telecon

[Jim Dinan]

I'm on the bridge if anyone wants to discuss.  Otherwise, I'll drop by
quarter past the hour.

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have not yet produced a new version of the proposal with the changes
> incorporated, but they are all captured in the attached PDF.  I'm happy to
> meet to review these, if folks want to.  One item that bears discussion is
> the change that would cause MPI_Group_compare operations to result in
> MPI_ALIASED when the group arguments belong to different processes.
>
>  ~Jim.
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Jim,
>>
>> Do you want to discuss the changes suggested at the Forum for the
>> endpoints reading at the call on Monday, or do you need more time?
>>
>> Since that's the only agenda item for now, we'll cancel the call if you
>> are not ready yet.
>>
>> There was some reasonable interest in the independent communicators
>> proposal.  At least enough to encourage me to pursue it.  I'm going to take
>> it offline for a bit to work on it and get some implementation experience
>> before bringing it back up again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>   -- Pavan
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-hybridpm/attachments/20141215/b5c8a481/attachment-0001.html>