[mpiwg-ft] [EXTERNAL] Re: FTWG Call Today

[Bland, Wesley]

We haven't had a review of the meeting time in a while. I'll send out a doodle.

> On Feb 14, 2017, at 2:51 PM, Teranishi, Keita <knteran at sandia.gov> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It will be hard for me to attend the meeting on time in the future meetings.
> 
> Thanks,
> Keita
> 
> On 2/14/17, 11:57 AM, "mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of Van Der Wijngaart, Rob F" <mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of rob.f.van.der.wijngaart at intel.com> wrote:
> 
>    Hi Keita,
>    It looks like folks are in favor of canceling today's meeting.
>    Rob
> 
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Teranishi, Keita
>    Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:51 AM
>    To: MPI WG Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group <mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org>; Ignacio Laguna <ilaguna at llnl.gov>
>    Subject: Re: [mpiwg-ft] [EXTERNAL] Re: FTWG Call Today
> 
>    All,
> 
> 
>    I am having the conflict.  It will be great if we can shift the meeting by 30 minutes.
> 
> 
>    Thanks,
>    Keita
> 
>    On 2/14/17, 11:01 AM, "mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of Bland, Wesley" <mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of wesley.bland at intel.com> wrote:
> 
>        Discussing them next meeting would be fine.
> 
>        From here on for the next couple of months, I might be a bit spotty. I'll be taking most of March off for our new baby. So if I don't send an email, you're welcome to assume that I'm gone and you can meet without me. :)
> 
>> On Feb 14, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Ignacio Laguna <lagunaperalt1 at llnl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Wesley and all,
>> 
>> I think it's safe to cancel today's call.
>> 
>> Regarding my tasks, we do have slides of the Reinit (backward recovery) proposal that I can present at any time. Perhaps we can discuss them in the next call/meeting? I have in my the to-do list to write text about combining the two recovery models (backward and forward recovery), but I haven't made progress on that.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ignacio Laguna
>> Center for Applied Scientific Computing (CASC)
>> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>> Phone: 925-422-7308, Fax: 925-422-6287
>> 
>> On 2/14/17 8:26 AM, Bland, Wesley wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> We have the FTWG call scheduled for today. AFAIK, we aren't planning any
>>> activity at the upcoming meeting. I'll get the non-ULFM issues ready for
>>> the next meeting that I'll be attending (likely September) and the
>>> ULFM/ULFM+/Reinit discussions should continue in the meantime.
>>> 
>>> is there something to discuss today? *I propose cancelling the call*
>>> since I don't think anyone has made progress that requires a phone call,
>>> but we can sync up a little bit over email.
>>> 
>>> ====
>>> 
>>> We've been floundering for a while as people have had other deadlines
>>> and distractions. Looking back at the notes from our last call in
>>> December, I believe the TODO items are for Aurelien, Ignacio, and myself
>>> to flesh out the three FT recovery proposals and then see how they would
>>> interact with each other.
>>> 
>>> * I believe Aurelien had some ideas about how to overcome some of the
>>> problems raised at the last meeting. Aurelien, if you could put together
>>> a slide or two that we could use for the discussion, that would probably
>>> be helpful.
>>> * I'm not sure of the status of Ignacio putting together some slides for
>>> the reinit proposal. If I remember the meeting long ago in San Jose, we
>>> just looked at a header. It might be nice to have something a little
>>> more high level to point to.
>>> * I still need to make the slides for the auto recovery strategy that
>>> Martin proposed.
>>> 
>>> Once that's done, we can see where these things interact and how
>>> difficult it would be to support them together.
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> Wesley
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-ft mailing list
>>> mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-ft mailing list
>> mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
> 
>        _______________________________________________
>        mpiwg-ft mailing list
>        mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>        https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
> 
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    mpiwg-ft mailing list
>    mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>    https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
>    _______________________________________________
>    mpiwg-ft mailing list
>    mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>    https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-ft mailing list
> mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft