[mpiwg-ft] [EXTERNAL] Re: FTWG Call Today

[Teranishi, Keita]

Hi,

It will be hard for me to attend the meeting on time in the future meetings.

Thanks,
Keita

On 2/14/17, 11:57 AM, "mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of Van Der Wijngaart, Rob F" <mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of rob.f.van.der.wijngaart at intel.com> wrote:

    Hi Keita,
    It looks like folks are in favor of canceling today's meeting.
    Rob
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Teranishi, Keita
    Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:51 AM
    To: MPI WG Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group <mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org>; Ignacio Laguna <ilaguna at llnl.gov>
    Subject: Re: [mpiwg-ft] [EXTERNAL] Re: FTWG Call Today
    
    All,
    
    
    I am having the conflict.  It will be great if we can shift the meeting by 30 minutes.
    
    
    Thanks,
    Keita
    
    On 2/14/17, 11:01 AM, "mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of Bland, Wesley" <mpiwg-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of wesley.bland at intel.com> wrote:
    
        Discussing them next meeting would be fine.
        
        From here on for the next couple of months, I might be a bit spotty. I'll be taking most of March off for our new baby. So if I don't send an email, you're welcome to assume that I'm gone and you can meet without me. :)
        
        > On Feb 14, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Ignacio Laguna <lagunaperalt1 at llnl.gov> wrote:
        > 
        > Hi Wesley and all,
        > 
        > I think it's safe to cancel today's call.
        > 
        > Regarding my tasks, we do have slides of the Reinit (backward recovery) proposal that I can present at any time. Perhaps we can discuss them in the next call/meeting? I have in my the to-do list to write text about combining the two recovery models (backward and forward recovery), but I haven't made progress on that.
        > 
        > 
        > -- 
        > Ignacio Laguna
        > Center for Applied Scientific Computing (CASC)
        > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
        > Phone: 925-422-7308, Fax: 925-422-6287
        > 
        > On 2/14/17 8:26 AM, Bland, Wesley wrote:
        >> Hi all,
        >> 
        >> We have the FTWG call scheduled for today. AFAIK, we aren't planning any
        >> activity at the upcoming meeting. I'll get the non-ULFM issues ready for
        >> the next meeting that I'll be attending (likely September) and the
        >> ULFM/ULFM+/Reinit discussions should continue in the meantime.
        >> 
        >> is there something to discuss today? *I propose cancelling the call*
        >> since I don't think anyone has made progress that requires a phone call,
        >> but we can sync up a little bit over email.
        >> 
        >> ====
        >> 
        >> We've been floundering for a while as people have had other deadlines
        >> and distractions. Looking back at the notes from our last call in
        >> December, I believe the TODO items are for Aurelien, Ignacio, and myself
        >> to flesh out the three FT recovery proposals and then see how they would
        >> interact with each other.
        >> 
        >> * I believe Aurelien had some ideas about how to overcome some of the
        >> problems raised at the last meeting. Aurelien, if you could put together
        >> a slide or two that we could use for the discussion, that would probably
        >> be helpful.
        >> * I'm not sure of the status of Ignacio putting together some slides for
        >> the reinit proposal. If I remember the meeting long ago in San Jose, we
        >> just looked at a header. It might be nice to have something a little
        >> more high level to point to.
        >> * I still need to make the slides for the auto recovery strategy that
        >> Martin proposed.
        >> 
        >> Once that's done, we can see where these things interact and how
        >> difficult it would be to support them together.
        >> 
        >> Thoughts?
        >> Wesley
        >> 
        >> 
        >> _______________________________________________
        >> mpiwg-ft mailing list
        >> mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
        >> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
        >> 
        > _______________________________________________
        > mpiwg-ft mailing list
        > mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
        > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
        
        _______________________________________________
        mpiwg-ft mailing list
        mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
        https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
        
    
    _______________________________________________
    mpiwg-ft mailing list
    mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
    https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
    _______________________________________________
    mpiwg-ft mailing list
    mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
    https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft