[mpiwg-ft] FTWG Call Today

Bland, Wesley wesley.bland at intel.com
Tue Feb 14 13:01:37 CST 2017

Discussing them next meeting would be fine.

>From here on for the next couple of months, I might be a bit spotty. I'll be taking most of March off for our new baby. So if I don't send an email, you're welcome to assume that I'm gone and you can meet without me. :)

> On Feb 14, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Ignacio Laguna <lagunaperalt1 at llnl.gov> wrote:
> Hi Wesley and all,
> I think it's safe to cancel today's call.
> Regarding my tasks, we do have slides of the Reinit (backward recovery) proposal that I can present at any time. Perhaps we can discuss them in the next call/meeting? I have in my the to-do list to write text about combining the two recovery models (backward and forward recovery), but I haven't made progress on that.
> -- 
> Ignacio Laguna
> Center for Applied Scientific Computing (CASC)
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
> Phone: 925-422-7308, Fax: 925-422-6287
> On 2/14/17 8:26 AM, Bland, Wesley wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> We have the FTWG call scheduled for today. AFAIK, we aren't planning any
>> activity at the upcoming meeting. I'll get the non-ULFM issues ready for
>> the next meeting that I'll be attending (likely September) and the
>> ULFM/ULFM+/Reinit discussions should continue in the meantime.
>> is there something to discuss today? *I propose cancelling the call*
>> since I don't think anyone has made progress that requires a phone call,
>> but we can sync up a little bit over email.
>> ====
>> We've been floundering for a while as people have had other deadlines
>> and distractions. Looking back at the notes from our last call in
>> December, I believe the TODO items are for Aurelien, Ignacio, and myself
>> to flesh out the three FT recovery proposals and then see how they would
>> interact with each other.
>> * I believe Aurelien had some ideas about how to overcome some of the
>> problems raised at the last meeting. Aurelien, if you could put together
>> a slide or two that we could use for the discussion, that would probably
>> be helpful.
>> * I'm not sure of the status of Ignacio putting together some slides for
>> the reinit proposal. If I remember the meeting long ago in San Jose, we
>> just looked at a header. It might be nice to have something a little
>> more high level to point to.
>> * I still need to make the slides for the auto recovery strategy that
>> Martin proposed.
>> Once that's done, we can see where these things interact and how
>> difficult it would be to support them together.
>> Thoughts?
>> Wesley
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-ft mailing list
>> mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-ft mailing list
> mpiwg-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft

More information about the mpiwg-ft mailing list