[Mpi3-ft] Con Call

Supalov, Alexander alexander.supalov at intel.com
Wed Feb 17 06:14:34 CST 2010

Dear Josh,

Thank you. A couple of questions if you permit:

1. Did anyone from the Collective WG look into this proposal?
2. How many simultaneous outstanding spawns are allowed on a communicator?
3. You use "I" right after the "MPI_", thus creating "MPI_ICOMM_*" names. Maybe it's better to say "MPI_COMM_I*" where appropriate?
4. What, apart from symmetry, motivates introduction of the MPI_ICOMM_JOIN?

Best regards.


-----Original Message-----
From: mpi3-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi3-ft-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Joshua Hursey
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:06 PM
To: MPI 3.0 Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group
Subject: Re: [Mpi3-ft] Con Call

I have updated the wiki page for "Nonblocking Process Creation and Management Operations" per our meeting today.

-- Josh

On Feb 16, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:

> Reminder that we will have a con-call tomorrow, Wed 2/17/2010, at 12 noon EST.
> Rich
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-ft mailing list
> mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft

mpi3-ft mailing list
mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen Germany
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr.
VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

More information about the mpiwg-ft mailing list