[Mpi3-ft] Transactional Messages
rlgraham at ornl.gov
Sat Feb 23 07:40:37 CST 2008
On 2/23/08 1:18 AM, "Greg Bronevetsky" <bronevetsky1 at llnl.gov> wrote:
>> Just to follow up, I think that the ³right² thing to do with respect to some
>> sort of
>> transactional model is to have some sort of standard way to request such
>> communications take place probably at init time. We have had such an MPI
>> implementation running in production for several years on a multi-thousand
>> process cluster, and the only thing that needs to be exposed to the users is
>> ability to turn on/off the functionality all the rest is taken care of
>> just fine within
>> the context of the MPI 2.0 standard, and is 100% standard compliant.
> Cool! Can you post the API for this thing? Might be a useful thing to start
> from. Also, its a prototype implementation.
>>> >> There is not new API, would just need to pass some sort of parameter to
>>> MPI_Init(). This
>>> >> is not the only place this is needed. If you want to take a look at the
>>> implementation, take
>>> >> a loot at http://public.lanl.gov/lampi
>> This does not deal with hints on the network ³state².
> Yeah, I'm not sure if such hints are valuable enough to be included in the
> spec. It really falls under the quality-of-service ideas what we've tossed
> around, so we should write up a proposal for those and see how much QoS people
> really want.
> Greg Bronevetsky
> Post-Doctoral Researcher
> 1028 Building 451
> Lawrence Livermore National Lab
> (925) 424-5756
> bronevetsky1 at llnl.gov
> Mpi3-ft mailing list
> Mpi3-ft at lists.mpi-forum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mpiwg-ft