[MPIWG Fortran] Question about an argument of MPI_Testall
rabenseifner at hlrs.de
Wed Mar 12 13:29:29 CDT 2014
For MPI-3.0 there was a ticket for new Fortran and
optional status versus MPI_STATUS(ES)_IGNORE
with all pros and cons
resulting in a clear "not optional" straw vote from the forum.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1 at cam.ac.uk>
> To: "MPI-WG Fortran working group" <mpiwg-fortran at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 5:44:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [MPIWG Fortran] Question about an argument of MPI_Testall
> On Mar 12 2014, William Gropp wrote:
> >On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> >> Rolf R. just reminded me off-list what the real reason is:
> >> MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE.
> Yes, that makes sense.
> > Should this be an optional argument in that case, and eliminate
> > MPI_STATUS_IGNORE and MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE, as was done for the C++
> > interface?
> In my view, yes. I regret the demise of the C++ interface, as I
> it cleaner, and this was one of those aspects.
> I am not disagreeing with Bill's points, of course - this is a value
> Nick Maclaren.
> mpiwg-fortran mailing list
> mpiwg-fortran at lists.mpi-forum.org
Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner at hlrs.de
High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530
University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832
Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner
Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . . . . (Office: Room 1.307)
More information about the mpiwg-fortran