[MPIWG Fortran] Question about an argument of MPI_Testall
nmm1 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Mar 12 11:44:24 CDT 2014
On Mar 12 2014, William Gropp wrote:
>On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>> Rolf R. just reminded me off-list what the real reason is:
Yes, that makes sense.
> Should this be an optional argument in that case, and eliminate
> MPI_STATUS_IGNORE and MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE, as was done for the C++
In my view, yes. I regret the demise of the C++ interface, as I found
it cleaner, and this was one of those aspects.
I am not disagreeing with Bill's points, of course - this is a value
More information about the mpiwg-fortran