[MPIWG Fortran] MPI_SIZEOF: redux
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
Fri Jun 6 09:00:56 CDT 2014
The majority of Fortran users in HPC are ignorant of F08 (beyond trivial notions, eg existence) and will still be by the time of MPI-4. I think deprecating this function must be coincident with deprecating the pre-F08 bindings since it is ootebtionskly required for pre-F08 MPI usage.
If we are serious about forcing everyone to use F08 (which I think is a terrible idea), then let's at least do it consistently.
Jeff
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 6, 2014, at 5:15 AM, Bill Long <longb at cray.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> Would it still be ok to deprecate MPI_SIZEOF in MPI-4 (which is at least ~2 years away)? We don't have to have any plan for removing it.
>
> I think that would be reasonable. In two years time more vendors will have implemented storage_size. And if it were well known that MPI wants people to migrate to this function, vendors would be motivated to add support sooner. The function itself is pretty trivial to implement as inline code by the compiler. It’s just a matter of vendor priorities.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
>
> Bill Long longb at cray.com
> Fortran Technical Suport & voice: 651-605-9024
> Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
> Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-fortran mailing list
> mpiwg-fortran at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran
More information about the mpiwg-fortran
mailing list