[MPIWG Fortran] Question about 388 errata
nmm1 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Sep 18 08:38:02 CDT 2013
On Sep 18 2013, Bill Long wrote:
>I'm not sufficiently informed about earlier MPI discussions to know
>which is intended, but wanted to point out the distinction. Rolf's
>statement is essentially a requirement that all MPI vendors support the
>new routines. Mine is just a statement of fact and does not impose a
>requirement on the vendors.
>I'm satisfied with either intention, since I use both of the new
>compilers and would always want (as a user, and provide as an MPI
>vendor) the new routines anyway.
When I can rely on the new interfaces, and get a moment to update my
course, I will start to teach them. I suspect that most users and
teachers will agree with us, so it really is fairly moot how this is
More information about the mpiwg-fortran