[MPIWG Fortran] Question about 388 errata
wgropp at illinois.edu
Wed Sep 18 07:36:24 CDT 2013
I like this, and prefer supports.
Director, Parallel Computing Institute
Deputy Director for Research
Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies
Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:11 AM, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
> On Sep 18 2013, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote:
>> I propose in https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/attachment/ticket/388/errata-30-ticket388-2013-09-12.pdf
>> Page 7 lines 14-15 read
>> For TS 29113 quality, new routines are needed only for routines with choice buffer arguments.
>> but should read
>> If the Fortran compiler implements TS 29113, then new routines are needed only for routines with choice buffer arguments.
>> (We always use the short-cut TS 29113, the long version is in the bib-list)
>> Jeff S., Jeff H., Craig, Bill L.,
>> please give an explicit okay (or a better text).
> 'supports' might be better than 'implements', but that's a trivial point.
> I think that it's very clear, and better than before.
> Nick Maclaren.
> mpiwg-fortran mailing list
> mpiwg-fortran at lists.mpi-forum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mpiwg-fortran