[Mpi-forum] which WG for generalized requests?

[Jeff Hammond]

The greq ticket is quite stable and I'd like to move forward with it without adding baggage.

Let's figure out more details of persistence before linear-combining it with other features. 

Jeff

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 22, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Anthony Skjellum <skjellum at auburn.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi, I think we should put generalized requests in the Persistent group :-)
> Seriously, I think we need persistent generalized requests.  Perhaps we can compare notes offline.
> 
> I really don't which group it goes in, but if we are revisiting GREQs we should consider persistent ones.
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
> 
> Anthony Skjellum, PhD
> Professor of Computer Science and Software Engineering
> COLSA Professor of Cybersecurity and Information Assurance
> Director of the Auburn Cyber Research Center and Lead Cyber Scientist for Auburn
> Samuel Ginn College of Engineering
> Auburn University
> skjellum at auburn.edu or skjellum at gmail.com
> cell: +1-205-807-4968 ; office: +1-334-844-6360
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
> may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person,
> use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: mpi-forum [mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] on behalf of Jeff Hammond [jeff.science at gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 6:02 PM
> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] which WG for generalized requests?
> 
> Martin:
> 
> Can you assign one of the two slots for the large-count WG on Monday
> to be a joint meeting with the greq WG?  Again, this assumes Fab will
> not veto this plan...
> 
> One of my main motivations for better greqs is large-count nonblocking
> collectives, so it makes sense to me to combine the discussion.  The
> other motivation for this at the San Jose meeting is that there's not
> time for a separate greq WG session since I'm otherwise obligated on
> Tuesday and it seems imprudent to overlap with WGs that Pavan is
> driving since he has expressed interest.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Jeff
> 
>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok.  Fab is currently the greq WG lead and I understand he's not going
>> to be absent from the Forum for a while (not immediately).
>> 
>> Martin: Can you assign Pavan and/or me as the WG lead, assuming Fab
>> consents to it?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Jeff
>> 
>>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It might make more sense to revive the generalized requests WG.  I'm very interested in helping drive the extended generalized requests proposal, whichever WG it ends up being in.
>>> 
>>>  -- Pavan
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I guess there is an inactive WG for generalized requests, but perhaps
>>>> it makes more sense to discuss in the context of the active p2p or
>>>> hybrid WG.
>>>> 
>>>> Does anyone have any comments on this?
>>>> 
>>>> The relevant ticket is https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/457.
>>>> 
>>>> My motivation for revisiting this issue is that I've found a number of
>>>> problems that can be addressed with MPICH-style generalized requests,
>>>> including large-count nonblocking collectives.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Jeff
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Jeff Hammond
>>>> jeff.science at gmail.com
>>>> http://jeffhammond.github.io/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Pavan Balaji  ✉️
>>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jeff Hammond
>> jeff.science at gmail.com
>> http://jeffhammond.github.io/
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Jeff Hammond
> jeff.science at gmail.com
> http://jeffhammond.github.io/
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum