[Mpi-forum] ABI

Jeff Hammond jeff.science at gmail.com
Thu Dec 5 12:14:22 CST 2013

relative to discuss at mpich, devel at mpich is the more appropriate place
for this.  it is not a discussion most users care about.  but i fail
to see why it is MPICH-specific.  even if the goal is not
standardization, i think this should remain within the MPI Forum so
that there is no appearance of bias w.r.t. which ABI is the best.


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> "Supalov, Alexander" <alexander.supalov at intel.com> writes:
>> I am afraid I cannot comment on particular snippets of other people's
>> email 5-6 year after the events. If you wish, we can get this trail
>> offline and go through the material with you.
> No worries.  I'm happy to discuss further, though this list probably
> isn't the best place.  Are the interested parties subscribed to
> discuss at mpich.org?
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com

More information about the mpi-forum mailing list