[Mpi-forum] Notes on discussions about 3.0 / 3.1?

Jeff Hammond jhammond at alcf.anl.gov
Thu May 31 15:58:04 CDT 2012


It would be useful to know what is not possible for 3.1.  For example,
I've been told that NBC could not have been done as MPI 2.3 because
they were a major change and that can't happen on minor version
releases.  Does that mean anything drastically new in form (e.g.
active messages not derived from MPI_Accumulate) are off the table and
have to wait for 4.0?

Jeff

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Richard Graham <richardg at mellanox.com> wrote:
> Comments in line
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 4:21 AM
> To: MPI Forum list
> Subject: [Mpi-forum] Notes on discussions about 3.0 / 3.1?
>
> Did anyone take any notes on the following two agenda items from the meeting this past week:
>
> - MPI 3.1 - initial plans
> [rich] Not much discussion at this stage.  The one thing I do remember is that we started to discuss voting, given that we are moving to a format of meeting once a quarter.  One of the things suggested was that we have a day in  between meetings for voting, doing this over the phone, but with attendance at the regular meetings continuing to determine voting elegibility.
>
> - MPI 3.0 - Draft standard
> [rich] (1)  Push to get all the voted in tickets into the draft standard by JUNE 15th.  This requires ticket owners and chapter committees to work together.  Chapter authors that don't participate would be replaced by others that will help get the revised text into the draft standard. (2) The July Chicago meeting will be devoted solely for getting the draft standard into final form.  Last second votes will take place on Monday, with the rest of the time dedicated to chapter committee work.  (3) The draft standard will be posted for public comment after the meeting, giving people time to comment before the final votes in Vienna.
>
> Rich
>
>
> I wasn't at the meeting, but would love to hear what the general discussion was around these two topics.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres at cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum



-- 
Jeff Hammond
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
University of Chicago Computation Institute
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond
https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond




More information about the mpi-forum mailing list