[Mpi-forum] Indices

[Torsten Hoefler]

George,

Thanks! The change is committed in r1502.

Torsten

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:25:08PM +0200, George Bosilca wrote:
> Torsten,
> 
> When the usage of the MPI_LB and MPI_UB has been replaced by the resize function the arrays used by the MPI_Type_struct (displacement and blacken) have been left behind. The patch below clean one of the examples from the collective chapter.
> 
>   george.
> 
> Index: chap-coll/coll.tex
> ===================================================================
> --- chap-coll/coll.tex	(revision 1482)
> +++ chap-coll/coll.tex	(working copy)
> @@ -1212,14 +1211,15 @@
>  %%HEADER
>  %%LANG: C
>  %%FRAGMENT
> +%%SUBST:...:
>  %%SKIPELIPSIS
>  %%ENDHEADER
>  \begin{Verbatim}[commandchars=\\\$\^]
>      MPI_Comm comm;
> -    int gsize,sendarray[100][150],*sptr;
> -    int root, *rbuf, stride, myrank, disp[2], blocklen[2];
> -    MPI_Datatype stype,type[2];
> -    int *displs,i,*rcounts;
> +    int gsize, sendarray[100][150], *sptr;
> +    int root, *rbuf, stride, myrank;
> +    MPI_Datatype stype;
> +    int *displs, i, *rcounts;
>  
>      ...
>  
> 
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 20:21 , William Gropp wrote:
> 
> > Yes, these need to be fixed.  
> > 
> > Mixed case in the function index means either the C binding name (or Fortran08 name) was used where the language-independent name should be used, or \func or \mpifunc were used for a language-binding-specific name (which is incorrect macro usage).  Chapter authors need to fix this.  There as also some non-functions in the function index; those must be fixed.
> > 
> > Example index entries need to be checked; I added a bunch to context as many examples were missing the index entries (made with \exindex).
> > 
> > I think it is ok for removed and deprecated names to show up in the index.
> > 
> > Bill
> > 
> > 
> > William Gropp
> > Director, Parallel Computing Institute
> > Deputy Director for Research
> > Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies
> > Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science
> > University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi All,
> >> 
> >> After reviewing the indices, I found a few issues:
> >> 
> >> - MPI_Type_struct and MPI_TYPE_EXTENT show up in the example indices. This should not happen as they are removed.
> >> - I'm not sure if removed and deprecated routines should show up in the Function Index, but right now, they do.
> >> - similarly in the MPI Callback Function Prototype Index
> >> - similarly in Constant and Predefined Handle Index
> >> - in the function index, many routines show up twice (caps and no caps) and some show up only with no caps.. All should be caps (I think).
> >> 
> >> Do the chapter authors need to fix those in their chapters?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mohamad
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpi-forum mailing list
> >> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpi-forum mailing list
> > mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 

-- 
### qreharg rug ebs fv crryF ------------- http://www.unixer.de/ -----
Torsten Hoefler         | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead
Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC)
1205 W Clark Street     | Urbana, IL, 61801
NCSA Building           | +01 (217) 244-7736