[Mpi-forum] Indices

[Torsten Hoefler]

George, 

Thanks! I assume Rolf's commit fixed all of those!

Thanks, 
  Torsten

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:22:05PM +0200, George Bosilca wrote:
> Here is the patch for the collective chapter removing the MPI_Type_struct from the example index.
> 
>   george.
> 
> Index: chap-coll/coll.tex
> ===================================================================
> --- chap-coll/coll.tex	(revision 1482)
> +++ chap-coll/coll.tex	(working copy)
> @@ -1163,7 +1163,6 @@
>  \begin{example} {\rm
>  \label{coll-exF}
>  \exindex{MPI\_Gatherv}%
> -\exindex{MPI\_Type\_struct}%
>  \exindex{MPI\_Type\_create\_struct}%
>  \exindex{MPI\_Type\_commit}%
>  
> @@ -1329,7 +1329,6 @@
>  \label{coll-exH}
>  \exindex{MPI\_Gather}%
>  \exindex{MPI\_Gatherv}%
> -\exindex{MPI\_Type\_struct}%
>  \exindex{MPI\_Type\_create\_struct}%
>  \exindex{MPI\_Type\_commit}%
>  
> @@ -3999,7 +3998,6 @@
>  \label{coll-exW}
>  \exindex{MPI\_Op\_create}%
>  \exindex{MPI\_Scan}%
> -\exindex{MPI\_Type\_struct}%
>  \exindex{MPI\_Type\_create\_struct}%
>  \exindex{MPI\_Type\_commit}%
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 20:21 , William Gropp wrote:
> 
> > Yes, these need to be fixed.  
> > 
> > Mixed case in the function index means either the C binding name (or Fortran08 name) was used where the language-independent name should be used, or \func or \mpifunc were used for a language-binding-specific name (which is incorrect macro usage).  Chapter authors need to fix this.  There as also some non-functions in the function index; those must be fixed.
> > 
> > Example index entries need to be checked; I added a bunch to context as many examples were missing the index entries (made with \exindex).
> > 
> > I think it is ok for removed and deprecated names to show up in the index.
> > 
> > Bill
> > 
> > 
> > William Gropp
> > Director, Parallel Computing Institute
> > Deputy Director for Research
> > Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies
> > Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science
> > University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi All,
> >> 
> >> After reviewing the indices, I found a few issues:
> >> 
> >> - MPI_Type_struct and MPI_TYPE_EXTENT show up in the example indices. This should not happen as they are removed.
> >> - I'm not sure if removed and deprecated routines should show up in the Function Index, but right now, they do.
> >> - similarly in the MPI Callback Function Prototype Index
> >> - similarly in Constant and Predefined Handle Index
> >> - in the function index, many routines show up twice (caps and no caps) and some show up only with no caps.. All should be caps (I think).
> >> 
> >> Do the chapter authors need to fix those in their chapters?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mohamad
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpi-forum mailing list
> >> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpi-forum mailing list
> > mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 

-- 
### qreharg rug ebs fv crryF ------------- http://www.unixer.de/ -----
Torsten Hoefler         | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead
Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC)
1205 W Clark Street     | Urbana, IL, 61801
NCSA Building           | +01 (217) 244-7736