[Mpi-forum] Indices

[George Bosilca]

Here is the patch for the collective chapter removing the MPI_Type_struct from the example index.

  george.

Index: chap-coll/coll.tex
===================================================================
--- chap-coll/coll.tex	(revision 1482)
+++ chap-coll/coll.tex	(working copy)
@@ -1163,7 +1163,6 @@
 \begin{example} {\rm
 \label{coll-exF}
 \exindex{MPI\_Gatherv}%
-\exindex{MPI\_Type\_struct}%
 \exindex{MPI\_Type\_create\_struct}%
 \exindex{MPI\_Type\_commit}%
 
@@ -1329,7 +1329,6 @@
 \label{coll-exH}
 \exindex{MPI\_Gather}%
 \exindex{MPI\_Gatherv}%
-\exindex{MPI\_Type\_struct}%
 \exindex{MPI\_Type\_create\_struct}%
 \exindex{MPI\_Type\_commit}%
 
@@ -3999,7 +3998,6 @@
 \label{coll-exW}
 \exindex{MPI\_Op\_create}%
 \exindex{MPI\_Scan}%
-\exindex{MPI\_Type\_struct}%
 \exindex{MPI\_Type\_create\_struct}%
 \exindex{MPI\_Type\_commit}%
 



On Jul 19, 2012, at 20:21 , William Gropp wrote:

> Yes, these need to be fixed.  
> 
> Mixed case in the function index means either the C binding name (or Fortran08 name) was used where the language-independent name should be used, or \func or \mpifunc were used for a language-binding-specific name (which is incorrect macro usage).  Chapter authors need to fix this.  There as also some non-functions in the function index; those must be fixed.
> 
> Example index entries need to be checked; I added a bunch to context as many examples were missing the index entries (made with \exindex).
> 
> I think it is ok for removed and deprecated names to show up in the index.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> William Gropp
> Director, Parallel Computing Institute
> Deputy Director for Research
> Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies
> Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science
> University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> After reviewing the indices, I found a few issues:
>> 
>> - MPI_Type_struct and MPI_TYPE_EXTENT show up in the example indices. This should not happen as they are removed.
>> - I'm not sure if removed and deprecated routines should show up in the Function Index, but right now, they do.
>> - similarly in the MPI Callback Function Prototype Index
>> - similarly in Constant and Predefined Handle Index
>> - in the function index, many routines show up twice (caps and no caps) and some show up only with no caps.. All should be caps (I think).
>> 
>> Do the chapter authors need to fix those in their chapters?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Mohamad
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum