[Mpi-forum] Jan MPI Forum meeting

[Fab Tillier]

To add to that, I don't see a second vote for ticket 279 (optional C++ bindings).  This should be just as fast as any other second vote.

Why aren't all tickets that had their 1st vote automatically scheduled for a 2nd vote if the implementation status isn't "waiting"?

Note too that the agenda lists ticket 278 as the ticket number for MPI_Icomm_dup, which is wrong.  Similarly, the C++ bindings ticket is listed as #168, but I'm guessing this should be #281. 

Cheers,
-Fab

Martin Schulz wrote on Mon, 12 Dec 2011 at 10:36:48

> Hi Rich,
> 
> I just looked over the agenda and noticed that the second votes for 266
> (MPI_T) and 204 (get_library_version) fell off - I had requested these early
> on (back in November) and I am pretty sure we had them in earlier drafts of
> the agenda. Could you please add them back in? Neither one should take
> very long and could be combined with other second votes.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> On Dec 12, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:
> 
>> Just a few items:
>>  - Those wanting to have a room in the block of room reserved at the
>>  Residence Inn has until 12/23/2012 to reserve a room - The agenda for
>>  the meeting is full now.  I will not be able to take any
> more requests at this stage.
>> 
>> Rich
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> ______________ Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov,
> http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National
> Laboratory, Livermore, USA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum