[Mpi-forum] MPI user survey
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
Sun Nov 15 10:30:33 CST 2009
On Nov 14, 2009, at 5:54 PM, Underwood, Keith D wrote:
> Processes per node appears to be a poor question without context.
> Do they have a 4 socket, 24 core node? Or an older 1 socket, 2 core
> node?
>
Can you suggest better wording?
> I don't think the RMA question will be interpreted correctly as is.
> The real core of it is more like "how much performance would you be
> willing to sacrifice to get derived datatypes, communicators,
> etc.?" I doubt that you can phrase the question this way, but I
> don't think it gains enough insight into that as is.
>
I am open to new wording here... (Josh and I struggled for quite a
while on the wording of this one)
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
More information about the mpi-forum
mailing list