[Mpi-22] SVN committing MPI-2.2 latex

William Gropp wgropp at [hidden]
Thu Jun 11 09:00:47 CDT 2009



Thanks, Jeff and Torsten.  I was about to ask for new states on the  
tickets for just this purpose.  I've also updated the README-2.2 to  
provide documentation on the markup to be used for 2.2 updates; I'm  
currently testing and refining the definition of those macros.  I'm  
trying those out on my chapters, plus ticket 16 from the datatypes  
chapter.

Bill

On Jun 11, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

> Torsten raised an excellent point in Menlo Park: we need to amend our
> 2.2 ticket process to include appropriate checks after a proposal has
> passed to ensure that the resulting text is committed properly and
> without errors.
>
> As discussed in Menlo Park, the suggestion is that chapter authors
> commit the text to SVN and then attach a PDF to the ticket to get
> reviewed by the existing ticket reviewers (potentially just a few PDF
> pages showing the changes).  Reviewers check that the resulting PDF is
> exactly what was passed in the body of the proposal.  Once the PDF
> passes review, the ticket can be closed.
>
> --> Rolf/Bill: chapter authors will need guidance on the appropriate
> Latex markup for signifying changes for MPI-2.2 (e.g., the text-
> coloring magic).
>
> A picture is worth 1,000 words: I have attached a suggested diagram of
> Trac ticket state transitions -- the new states are yellow and
> underlined (some old states changed names slightly; those changed are
> yellow/underlined as well).
>
> Comments?  (particularly from Bill and chapter authors)
>
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> Cisco Systems
> <MPI-2.2 ticket states-suggested.pdf><ATT00001.txt>

William Gropp
Deputy Director for Research
Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies
Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign



More information about the Mpi-22 mailing list