[Mpi-21] TODO - AUTHORS of MPI-2.1 - Workplan

Jeff Squyres jsquyres at [hidden]
Thu Apr 3 14:27:08 CDT 2008



What about the C++/Fortran language bindings text?  Should the  
majority of chapter 13 be merged into Terms and Conventions (and  
elsewhere)?

It's not really a "problem", per se -- but it is a little awkward.   
There are sections in chapter 13 that could definitely fit in existing  
text elsewhere.  Some of it is redundant, too.

On Apr 3, 2008, at 3:19 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Bronis,
>
> If the data-type section get moved into the chapter 3 it make sense  
> to merge the leftover of the chapter 11 with chapter 7, as long as  
> we choose a right name. "MPI Environmental Management" is not the  
> right chapter for "Generalized Requests". But of course these are  
> just details.
>
> I'll get in touch with you asap to see how we can coordinate.
>
>  Thanks,
>    george.
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote:
>>
>> Rolf:
>>
>> Re:
>>> my general statements do not answer you initial question:
>>
>> My opinion is that leaving obvious problems unfixed based
>> on an expected future version is a bad idea. However, I
>> don't want to argue over this since I think the best
>> approach is just to remove them now and then we don't
>> have to worry about them. Others have more concerns over
>> the time that they can devote to this (not that I have an
>> abundance) and might want to delay in any event in order
>> to get it right (at least mostly).
>>
>>> If you decide to move parts from Chap.11 to  Chap.7,
>>> then you both mus discuss this. You both are responsible
>>> for these chapters.
>>> And you should first convince your reviewers:
>>> - Chap. 7: Rich, Jesper, Steve, Kannan, David, Bill
>>> - Chap.11: Bill and Rainer
>>> My recommendation:
>>> Express clearly which parts should be moved exactly to wich line
>>> (all based on page/line numbers as **printed** in Draft Apr. 1,  
>>> 2008).
>>
>> I have discussed moving the datatype decoding stuff
>> with Rich and Bill. I will move those sections as I
>> suggested, with an initial pass for the current review.
>> This works well for Rich since he does not have time
>> to do this for another couple of weeks. I hope to get
>> that done today.
>>
>> For the remainder, I will look over the two chapters
>> (7 & 11) and propose an initial merge strategy. George
>> can react to that; I don't know how long it will take
>> me to get that done...
>>
>> Bronis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-21 mailing list
>> mpi-21_at_[hidden]
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-21
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-21 mailing list
> mpi-21_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-21


-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems




More information about the Mpi-21 mailing list