[mpiwg-tools] Ticket 358

[Marc-Andre Hermanns]

Dear all,

I just got a chance to talk to Rolf on this ticket:
https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/358

The reason for this ticket was that in ticket 453
(https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/453), which passed
as 3.0 errata, it is now explicitly allowed to declare functions in the
MPI_ namespace, as long as the user wants to make use of the profiling
interface.

The question now is, whether we should have a clarifying sentence in the
profiling chapter to tell users of the interface not to tamper with the
existing semantics of specific calls.

Rolf understood that the current wording in the ticket may be too
ristrictive, as it remains unclear what 'fully conforms' still allows.
His suggestion was maybe a less restrictive wording, where tools like
MPIEcho are still allowed.

Cheers,
Marc-Andre
-- 
Marc-Andre Hermanns
Jülich Aachen Research Alliance,
High Performance Computing (JARA-HPC)
German Research School for Simulation Sciences GmbH

Schinkelstrasse 2
52062 Aachen
Germany

Phone: +49 241 80 99753
Fax: +49 241 80 6 99753
www.grs-sim.de/parallel
email: m.a.hermanns at grs-sim.de

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4912 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-tools/attachments/20150203/7ed416d0/attachment.bin>