[mpiwg-tools] Profiling for MPI_SIZEOF?

[Martin Schulz]

I also can¹t think of a need to intercept this call - I would be OK with
option #1 as well.

Martin

________________________________________________________________________
Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA








On 5/15/14, 1:38 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:

>On May 15, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Marc-Andre Hermanns
><m.a.hermanns at grs-sim.de> wrote:
>
>> isn't MPI_SIZEOF also named as a function that is allowed to be
>> implemented as a macro?
>
>Not that I can find -- that's why I'm asking this question...
>
>> Also, the call is likely to be so short (in duration) that you'd have a
>> huge overhead in intercepting it.
>> 
>> I would also be ok with proposed solution #1.
>
>
>Good.  Bill Long is, too.  :-)
>
>-- 
>Jeff Squyres
>jsquyres at cisco.com
>For corporate legal information go to:
>http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpiwg-tools mailing list
>mpiwg-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools