[mpiwg-tools] Profiling for MPI_SIZEOF?
schulzm at llnl.gov
Fri May 16 00:40:56 CDT 2014
I also can¹t think of a need to intercept this call - I would be OK with
option #1 as well.
Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
On 5/15/14, 1:38 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
>On May 15, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Marc-Andre Hermanns
><m.a.hermanns at grs-sim.de> wrote:
>> isn't MPI_SIZEOF also named as a function that is allowed to be
>> implemented as a macro?
>Not that I can find -- that's why I'm asking this question...
>> Also, the call is likely to be so short (in duration) that you'd have a
>> huge overhead in intercepting it.
>> I would also be ok with proposed solution #1.
>Good. Bill Long is, too. :-)
>jsquyres at cisco.com
>For corporate legal information go to:
>mpiwg-tools mailing list
>mpiwg-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
More information about the mpiwg-tools