[mpiwg-tools] Tools WG webex tomorrow!

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)]

On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:23 PM, "Schulz, Martin" <schulz6 at llnl.gov> wrote:

>> I am now on the SUCCESS side of the fence. Does it need to be clarified as an errata? I would suggest (from 3.0 clean doc):

Just to be totally clear: I don't really care which way it goes.  I just saw this issue as an ambiguity that should be resolved.

>> page 580, line 41: 
>> In this case, the routine returns MPI_SUCCESS if all variables are started successfully, otherwise MPI_T_ERR_PVAR_NO_STARTSTOP is returned. MPI_SUCCESS is also returned if no handles are valid for session and MPI_T_PVAR_ALL_HANDLES is passed in handle. 
> 
> Hmm - I fear we would have to be even more explicit: MPI_SUCCESS is also returned if MPI_T_PVAR_ALL_HANDLES is passed in handles and if no handles are valid for session or all valid handles represent continuous (read only for reset) variables.

+1.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/