[Mpi3-tools] Final draft of MPIR Document

[Dong H. Ahn]

  Hi Martin,

Whatever term you decided to use, please use it consistently across the 
text. There are several places where the term, MPIR launch/attach model, 
is used in the text.

Thanks.

Dong

On 8/27/2010 4:55 PM, Martin Schulz wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote:
>
>> Martin:
>>
>> I'm not sure why the term "modi" was used but in the
>> least it is a rather arcane usage. I see nothing in
>> the Wikipedia list that is applicable:
> I actually added that in the last round and I can certainly switch it
> to modes (I was debating that) - originally we had models there,
> but that didn't seem right to me. Other suggestions are welcome.
>
> Martin
>
>
>> http://**en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modi
>>
>> I suggest you change this to "modes"...
>>
>> I'll refraing from other grammatical suggestions.
>>
>> Bronis
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Martin Schulz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Attached is the final version of the MPIR document, as we are
>>> planning
>>> to present it to
>>> the MPI forum. Please speak up if you have any final comments or
>>> concerns. Otherwise,
>>> we are planning to submit this version on Monday to the forum for
>>> review for the
>>> September meeting.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mpi3-tools mailing list
>> Mpi3-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://**lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools
>>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://*people.llnl.gov/schulzm
> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-tools mailing list
> Mpi3-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://*lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools
>