[Mpi3-tools] Final draft of MPIR Document
Dong H. Ahn
ahn1 at llnl.gov
Fri Aug 27 19:05:41 CDT 2010
Whatever term you decided to use, please use it consistently across the
text. There are several places where the term, MPIR launch/attach model,
is used in the text.
On 8/27/2010 4:55 PM, Martin Schulz wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote:
>> I'm not sure why the term "modi" was used but in the
>> least it is a rather arcane usage. I see nothing in
>> the Wikipedia list that is applicable:
> I actually added that in the last round and I can certainly switch it
> to modes (I was debating that) - originally we had models there,
> but that didn't seem right to me. Other suggestions are welcome.
>> I suggest you change this to "modes"...
>> I'll refraing from other grammatical suggestions.
>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Martin Schulz wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Attached is the final version of the MPIR document, as we are
>>> to present it to
>>> the MPI forum. Please speak up if you have any final comments or
>>> concerns. Otherwise,
>>> we are planning to submit this version on Monday to the forum for
>>> review for the
>>> September meeting.
>> Mpi3-tools mailing list
>> Mpi3-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://*people.llnl.gov/schulzm
> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
> Mpi3-tools mailing list
> Mpi3-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
More information about the mpiwg-tools