From howardp at lanl.gov Mon Sep 20 11:05:09 2021 From: howardp at lanl.gov (Pritchard Jr., Howard) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:05:09 +0000 Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] Meet today Message-ID: <95BA7518-622C-4698-9A67-B7342762B221@lanl.gov> Hi All, Let?s meet today. I?d like to discuss outcome of the September MPI Forum and continue where we were with sessions round 2. Thanks, Howard ? [signature_61897647] Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV Los Alamos National Laboratory howardp at lanl.gov [signature_1997368385][signature_1606677857][signature_1860537118][signature_782307095] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 4349 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 1980 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 1516 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 1333 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 998 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: From work at wesbland.com Mon Sep 20 12:12:40 2021 From: work at wesbland.com (Wesley Bland) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:12:40 -0500 Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions Message-ID: Hi all, In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan ?representing? the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn?t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link . While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you?re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you?re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won?t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) Based on the responses, I?ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. Thanks, Wes -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danholmes at chi.scot Wed Sep 22 11:05:07 2021 From: danholmes at chi.scot (Dan Holmes) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:05:07 +0100 Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1CBB8D4B-ACA3-4CC1-8FE7-21FC01231D4C@chi.scot> Hi all, I prefer option 1 but could do option 2 instead. I don?t like option 3. Cheers, Dan. ? Dr Daniel Holmes PhD Executive Director Chief Technology Officer CHI Ltd danholmes at chi.scot > On 20 Sep 2021, at 18:12, Wesley Bland via mpiwg-sessions wrote: > > Hi all, > > In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan ?representing? the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: > > 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn?t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). > > 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. > > 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. > > So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: > > a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link . While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. > > b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you?re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you?re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won?t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) > > Based on the responses, I?ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. > > Thanks, > Wes > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-sessions mailing list > mpiwg-sessions at lists.mpi-forum.org > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From howardp at lanl.gov Wed Sep 22 15:15:37 2021 From: howardp at lanl.gov (Pritchard Jr., Howard) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:15:37 +0000 Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpiwg-ft] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions In-Reply-To: <1CBB8D4B-ACA3-4CC1-8FE7-21FC01231D4C@chi.scot> References: <1CBB8D4B-ACA3-4CC1-8FE7-21FC01231D4C@chi.scot> Message-ID: HI Wesley Option 1 would work best for me, although 2 would be okay. Howard From: mpiwg-ft on behalf of Dan Holmes via mpiwg-ft Reply-To: MPI WG Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 at 10:05 AM To: Wesley Bland Cc: Dan Holmes , MPI Forum Fault Tolerance Working Group , MPI Sessions working group Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpiwg-ft] [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions Hi all, I prefer option 1 but could do option 2 instead. I don?t like option 3. Cheers, Dan. ? Dr Daniel Holmes PhD Executive Director Chief Technology Officer CHI Ltd danholmes at chi.scot On 20 Sep 2021, at 18:12, Wesley Bland via mpiwg-sessions > wrote: Hi all, In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan ?representing? the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn?t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link. While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you?re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you?re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won?t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) Based on the responses, I?ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. Thanks, Wes _______________________________________________ mpiwg-sessions mailing list mpiwg-sessions at lists.mpi-forum.org https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bouteill at icl.utk.edu Thu Sep 23 08:58:29 2021 From: bouteill at icl.utk.edu (Aurelien Bouteiller) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:58:29 -0400 Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpiwg-ft] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions In-Reply-To: References: <1CBB8D4B-ACA3-4CC1-8FE7-21FC01231D4C@chi.scot> Message-ID: <3C9725A8-E945-430B-B97C-E27999BA009C@icl.utk.edu> I prefer option 2 but can work with 1 as well, don?t like 3. Aurelien > On Sep 22, 2021, at 16:15, Pritchard Jr., Howard via mpiwg-sessions wrote: > > HI Wesley > > Option 1 would work best for me, although 2 would be okay. > > Howard > > From: mpiwg-ft on behalf of Dan Holmes via mpiwg-ft > Reply-To: MPI WG Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group > Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 at 10:05 AM > To: Wesley Bland > Cc: Dan Holmes , MPI Forum Fault Tolerance Working Group , MPI Sessions working group > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpiwg-ft] [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions > > Hi all, > > I prefer option 1 but could do option 2 instead. I don?t like option 3. > > Cheers, > Dan. > ? > Dr Daniel Holmes PhD > Executive Director > Chief Technology Officer > CHI Ltd > danholmes at chi.scot > > > > >> On 20 Sep 2021, at 18:12, Wesley Bland via mpiwg-sessions wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan ?representing? the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: >> >> 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn?t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). >> >> 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. >> >> 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. >> >> So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: >> >> a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link. While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. >> >> b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you?re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you?re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won?t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) >> >> Based on the responses, I?ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. >> >> Thanks, >> Wes >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-sessions mailing list >> mpiwg-sessions at lists.mpi-forum.org >> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-sessions mailing list > mpiwg-sessions at lists.mpi-forum.org > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions From howardp at lanl.gov Mon Sep 27 10:01:35 2021 From: howardp at lanl.gov (Pritchard Jr., Howard) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:01:35 +0000 Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] Sessions WG - meet today Message-ID: <57E6FC4F-768F-4209-B01E-B4E9BB0F25FF@lanl.gov> Hi All, We?ll meet today to pick up on where we left over a while ago with dynamic process set discussions, and discuss coordination with the FT working group. Howard ? [signature_61897647] Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV Los Alamos National Laboratory howardp at lanl.gov [signature_764170054][signature_1575488158][signature_1944054083][signature_1613426247] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 4349 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 1980 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 1516 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 1333 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 998 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: From work at wesbland.com Mon Sep 27 10:10:41 2021 From: work at wesbland.com (Wesley Bland) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 10:10:41 -0500 Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] FTWG & Sessions WG Joint Discussions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <984B91A6-4727-4402-8D0D-DCB82438F0AB@wesbland.com> Hi all, I want to remind folks to please reply to this email with your preferences. Right now, I have an even split of 1s (Sessions folks) and 2s (FT folks). Logistically, it would probably be simpler to do 1 so we don?t have to shuffle between topics, so that would be my preference, but please indicate your's by replying. I?ll work with the WG leaders on Wednesday to set up whatever we pick. Thanks, Wes > On Sep 20, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Wesley Bland wrote: > > Hi all, > > In the recent plenary discussion in the MPI Forum about future fault tolerance proposals, it became clear that our two working groups needed to coordinate some of our work to avoid duplication and promote interoperability. In the FTWG today, we discussed this a little more with Dan ?representing? the Sessions WG. At this point, it probably makes sense to try to find a few times over the next few months where we can all meet together to cover topics that our two groups are exploring. I think we have three options to do this: > > 1. The FTWG meets every other week. On weeks where the FTWG isn?t meeting anyway, we could have a joint meeting during the Sessions WG time slot (12pm US Central I think). The FTWG met this week so this would theoretically start next week (or two weeks after that). > > 2. Merge the meeting time slots and share the middle hour. The FTWG meets in the hour before the Sessions WG. So we could have the middle hour (11:30am - 12:30pm US Central time) be common time every other week to discuss common items while leaving time for the two WGs during their normal time slots. This would involve some Zoom link merging, but we could figure that out. > > 3. Pick a completely different time to meet in addition to our existing WG times. > > So as an action item for each person who is interested in participating here are two things to do: > > a. Indicate your availability for a meeting on this doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/2wztvc68b8gw6e7m?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link . While the poll is anchored to this week, the times are for a recurring meeting every other week, so ignore any one-off conflicts you have this week. > > b. Pick your preference between 1, 2, and 3 above and respond to this email. If you?re not on both mailing lists, this will likely generate a bunch of bounces for you. Feel free to register for the list you?re not currently on to avoid that problem. You can also reply just to me, but you won?t impose your preferences on the rest of the group that way. :) > > Based on the responses, I?ll try to find a time that works best for the most people. > > Thanks, > Wes -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From howardp at lanl.gov Mon Sep 27 11:57:34 2021 From: howardp at lanl.gov (Pritchard Jr., Howard) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:57:34 +0000 Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] Running a bit late - 5 minutes (EOM) Message-ID: <81310FA9-3EB5-497B-A08C-203F4508C782@lanl.gov> ? [signature_61897647] Howard Pritchard Research Scientist HPC-ENV Los Alamos National Laboratory howardp at lanl.gov [signature_2109681759][signature_104855017][signature_945937568][signature_1154017685] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 4349 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 1980 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 1516 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 1333 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 998 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: