[mpiwg-rma] Default value of accumulate_ops info key

[Balaji, Pavan]

The invite went out to the entire WG.  I've attached it again as an ics file with this email.

RMA WG recurring telecon
Scheduled: Nov 5, 2018 at 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM
To join the Meeting:
https://bluejeans.com/173205081/3141592

To join via Room System:
Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
Meeting ID : 173205081
Participant Passcode : 3141592

To join via phone :
1)  Dial:
        +1.408.317.9254 (US (San Jose))
        +1.866.226.4650 (US Toll Free)
        (see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
2)  Enter Conference ID : 173205081
3)  Enter Participant Passcode : 3141592



  -- Pavan

> On Nov 2, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Fujita, Hajime <hajime.fujita at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Pavan,
>
> So the next meeting is at 11/5 (Mon) 2pm central? I don't see a calendar invite.
>
> Thanks,
> Hajime
>
> On 11/2/18, 12:11 PM, "mpiwg-rma on behalf of Balaji, Pavan via mpiwg-rma" <mpiwg-rma-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org on behalf of mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:
>
>    Hi Joseph,
>
>    I don't know about MPI-3.2, but if the Forum accepts the proposal, I believe we have started pushing out draft standards which can be used.  Having said that, I don't know if MPI implementations will implement draft standards or wait till the final standard is out.
>
>    The last telecon was canceled.  We have one more this coming Monday.
>
>      -- Pavan
>
>> On Nov 2, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Joseph Schuchart via mpiwg-rma <mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> While working on a code that makes use of MPI accumulate operations, I stumbled upon reading the description of the `accumulate_ops` info key. The standard (v3.1) states "The default is same_op_no_op." My interpretation is that this is the value used if the info key is not specified (based on my understanding of the term `default`). How would I specify my intent to use any accumulate operation? From looking at one implementation, the default is to expect the use of any operation but that seems inconsistent and confusing for users.
>>
>> I remember the discussion of a proposal for v4.0 to add `any_op` in a recent phone conference but I couldn't find that proposal anywhere online. Would it be possible to fix this issue in v3.2 by removing the sentence quoted above?
>>
>> On another note: Based on the invitation sent out by Pavan Balaji I tried to join the biweekly phone conference on Monday last week (10/22) at 2pm central time but the conference room was empty. Is this still the current schedule? Maybe I just got the timezones messed up?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>> Joseph Schuchart
>> --
>> Dipl.-Inf. Joseph Schuchart
>> High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS)
>> Nobelstr. 19
>> D-70569 Stuttgart
>>
>> Tel.: +49(0)711-68565890
>> Fax: +49(0)711-6856832
>> E-Mail: schuchart at hlrs.de
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-rma mailing list
>> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-rma
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    mpiwg-rma mailing list
>    mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
>    https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-rma
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20181102/cfc929ce/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: iCal-20181102-145639.ics
Type: text/calendar
Size: 3110 bytes
Desc: iCal-20181102-145639.ics
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20181102/cfc929ce/attachment-0001.ics>