[mpiwg-rma] MPI_Win_create on unmapped memory?

[Nathan Hjelm]

I would expect that the intent is also that the memory should not be freed/unmapped before the matching call to MPI_Win_free() correct?

-Nathan

On Jan 02, 2018, at 01:19 PM, William Gropp <wgropp at illinois.edu> wrote:

It was certainly the intent that the memory be allocated.  Specifically, if a is the pointer and the region is of length L, then (assuming char *a and ) a[0] … a[L-1] must be valid r and l values at the point of the call.

Bill

William Gropp
Director and Chief Scientist, NCSA
Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

On Jan 2, 2018, at 1:52 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
If a user passes a (base,size) pair that corresponds to a range of addresses that are not allocated and/or mapped, is that a correct MPI program?

The only text I can find that implies that buffers passed to MPI_Win_create have to be allocated is the following, assuming that one interprets "existing memory" this way.  

"Each process specifies a window of existing memory that it exposes to RMA accesses by the processes in the group of comm." (MPI 3.1 11.2.1)

The Fortran-specific text is similarly suggestive, but it only says that a user can pass a simply contiguous array, not that such a thing is required.

"In Fortran, one can pass the first element of a memory region or a whole array, which must be ‘simply contiguous’"

Thanks,

Jeff

--
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/
_______________________________________________
mpiwg-rma mailing list
mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-rma

_______________________________________________
mpiwg-rma mailing list
mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-rma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20180102/4ad3606d/attachment.html>