[mpiwg-rma] MPI RMA status summary

[William Gropp]

Thanks.  I (and someone else apparently - thanks!) have updated the agenda.

Bill

On Nov 13, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Bill,
> 
> #363 - Closed as withdrawn
> #366 - Closed as withdrawn
> 
> #401 - It would be nice to add this as errata in MPI 3.1, if the WG can reach agreement on text in time
> #439 - Queued up for WG discussion as an MPI 4.0 proposal.  Torsten has a competing proposal that does not have a ticket registered in Trac.  I added a link to his slides on #439.
> 
> #460 - Not on your list.  This is a proposal for a new info key that was suggested by a user.  Should be queued up for WG discussion.
> 
>  ~Jim.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, William Gropp <wgropp at illinois.edu> wrote:
> I looked through all of the tickets and wrote a summary of the open issues, which I’ve attached.  I propose the following:
> 
> Determine which of these issues can be resolved by email.  A significant number can probably be closed with no further action.
> 
> For those requiring rework, determine if there is still interest in them, and if not, close them as well.
> 
> For the ones requiring discussion, assign someone to organize a position and discussion.  We can schedule telecons to go over those issues.  The first item in the list is certainly in this class.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Bill
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20141113/47e7c70d/attachment-0001.html>