[mpiwg-rma] same_op_no_op

[William Gropp]

Thanks - I've found it and fixed it for 3.1.

Bill

William Gropp
Director, Parallel Computing Institute
Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign





On May 30, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Jed Brown wrote:

> "Zhao, Xin" <xinzhao3 at illinois.edu> writes:
>> This is the same model we have been using for other info arguments, e.g.,
>> 
>> "no_locks — if set to true, then the implementation may assume that
>> passive target syn- chronization (i.e., MPI_WIN_LOCK, MPI_LOCK_ALL)
>> will not be used on the given window."
> 
> BTW, this quote from the MPI-3 standard contains a typo.  It should be
> MPI_WIN_LOCK_ALL.  I don't have access to the report repository so I
> don't know if it has been fixed.
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20140530/503585b7/attachment-0001.html>