[mpiwg-rma] same_op_no_op

Jeff Hammond jeff.science at gmail.com
Fri Mar 14 12:05:27 CDT 2014

If my compiler has a flag for -fdisable-long-double-complex, we're good, right?


Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 14, 2014, at 11:54 AM, "Underwood, Keith D" <keith.d.underwood at intel.com> wrote:

>> 2. Now we expect every system to have the equivalent of CMPXCHG16B and
>> that basic types will never be longer than 16B (unless a longer atomic is made
>> available)?
> You mean... like long double complex?

More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list