[mpiwg-rma] same_op_no_op

Dave Goodell (dgoodell) dgoodell at cisco.com
Thu Mar 13 14:54:49 CDT 2014

On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:

> same_op_no_op_replace might not be completely SHMEM-compliant but it
> almost certainly meets the needs of reasonable SHMEM programs.  Right
> now, the incompatibility of REPLACE and <any reduce op> puts me in a
> very bad place for essentially all PGAS models.

Wouldn't you be in a perfectly fine place if we just add "same_op_no_op_replace" to the standard and then you modify your codes to use it?

I really don't understand your insistence on changing the default behavior...


More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list