[mpiwg-rma] same_op_no_op
Balaji, Pavan
balaji at anl.gov
Mon Mar 10 22:03:25 CDT 2014
If a hardware can implement MPI_SUM, it should be able to implement MPI_SUM with 0 as well.
But that’s not a generic solution.
Jeff: at some point you were planning to bring in a ticket which does more combinations of operations than just same_op and no_op. Maybe it’s worthwhile bringing that up again?
— Pavan
On Mar 10, 2014, at 9:26 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe there's a loophole that I'm forgetting?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
> How the hell can I do GA or SHMEM then? Roll my own mutexes and commit perf-suicide?
>
> Jeff
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 10, 2014, at 8:32 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You can't use replace and sum concurrently at a given target address.
>>
>> ~Jim.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Given the following, how do I use MPI_NO_OP, MPI_REPLACE and MPI_SUM
>> in accumulate/atomic operations in a standard-compliant way?
>>
>> accumulate_ops — if set to same_op, the implementation will assume
>> that all concurrent accumulate calls to the same target address will
>> use the same operation. If set to same_op_no_op, then the
>> implementation will assume that all concurrent accumulate calls to the
>> same target address will use the same operation or MPI_NO_OP. This can
>> eliminate the need to protect access for certain operation types where
>> the hardware can guarantee atomicity. The default is same_op_no_op.
>>
>> We discuss this before and the resolution was not satisfying to me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Hammond
>> jeff.science at gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-rma mailing list
>> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-rma mailing list
>> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
More information about the mpiwg-rma
mailing list