[mpiwg-rma] Fence + threads
jeff.science at gmail.com
Fri Jun 20 12:32:29 CDT 2014
I want it to be legal, don't think it's clear from the standard, and expect that pattern to break some implementations.
What's the use case?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 20, 2014, at 11:16 AM, "Balaji, Pavan" <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
> Is the following code correct? Two threads of a process both do the following:
> Collectives are not allowed on the same communicator simultaneously. But we don’t say anything similar for windows.
> — Pavan
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
More information about the mpiwg-rma