[Mpi3-rma] MPI-3.0 Errata tickets in RMA chapter

[Jim Dinan]

Hi Martin,

I don't currently have an estimate, but I think it would make sense to 
set aside an hour of plenary time to work through RMA errata.

  ~Jim.

On 1/11/13 1:10 PM, Schulz, Martin wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Jim Dinan wrote:
>
>> Hi Rolf,
>>
>> I updated tickets 347, 348, 350, and 355 to errata.  The RMA WG will prepare these for passage at the March meeting.
>
> Do you have an estimate of how much time you want for this? Do you expect any large discussions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
>
>>
>> ~Jim.
>>
>> On 1/9/13 4:00 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote:
>>> Jim and all,
>>>
>>> I expect that you may want to handle the tickets
>>> #347, #348, #350, and #355 as MPI-3.0 errata.
>>>
>>> For this, the most simplest is to add "MPI-3.0 Errata:" at the
>>> beginning of your ticket title.
>>> I did this in #345. It passed at the Dec. 2012 meeting.
>>>
>>> You should pass such errata as fast as possible, probably in
>>> the next meeting.
>>>
>>> I do not know whether ticket #346 is an errata (i.e., clarification
>>> or correction of a wrong, inconsistent or missing definition)
>>> or a new feature.
>>>
>>> As usual at the end, I'll put all the errata in a separate section
>>> in MPI-next, as I did in MPI-3.0 B.1.1.
>>> Therefore I prefer to have such a clean visibility in the title.
>>> The method we used in MPI-3.0 was too dangerous (we oversaw them for
>>> an extremely long time).
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Rolf
>>>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm
> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>
>
>