[Mpi3-rma] [EXTERNAL] Re: MPI-3 UNIFIED model clarification

Jed Brown jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Aug 4 18:15:55 CDT 2013

Pavan Balaji <balaji at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> SEPARATE is too expensive for such cases.

What is the lightest weight way for the source to create an ordering at
the target (which will be using MPI_Win_sync)?  How does the overhead of
that compare to MPI_Win_sync?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20130804/857a0aaf/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list