[Mpi3-rma] MPI-3 UNIFIED model clarification
jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Aug 2 22:42:12 CDT 2013
"Underwood, Keith D" <keith.d.underwood at intel.com> writes:
> The point of UNIFIED was that we add a more useful model that worked
> in *some* places.
Keith, should the standard include an example of UNIFIED that is
portable, but does not call MPI_Win_sync?
If so, what memory model should be assumed? (C11 seems like a likely
candidate, though I think the best quality documentation on these
affairs is associated with the Linux kernel, and is readily implemented
without language extensions.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the mpiwg-rma