[Mpi3-rma] Alternative Proposal for Shared Memory Support

[Rajeev Thakur]

I assumed the epoch was not needed :-).

Rajeev

On Mar 16, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Torsten Hoefler wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:22:05AM -0500, James Dinan wrote:
>> Hi Rajeev,
>> 
>> Why not use lock/unlock?  Lock_all seems like a good fit here.
> Yes, I omitted the epoch (like Rajeev did in his example). I assumed
> lock/unlock (all).
> 
> Torsten
> 
> -- 
> bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ -----
> Torsten Hoefler         | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead
> Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC)
> 1205 W Clark Street     | Urbana, IL, 61801
> NCSA Building           | +01 (217) 244-7736
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-rma mailing list
> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma