[Mpi3-rma] MPI_Win_Allocate_shared proposal draft
Rajeev Thakur
thakur at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Aug 29 13:16:57 CDT 2011
Looks good. Some comments:
6:14 - baseptrs -> baseptr
6:26 - DISP_UNIT -> SIZE
6:30 - "among all processes" -> "among all processes in comm"
6:31 - "returns" -> "and returns"
6:32 - "be target" -> "be the target"
6:33 - "accessed" -> "accesses"
6:33 - change to "remote processes; the base pointers for other processes can be queried..."
6:35 - Much of the sentence "The returned memory..." seems to be a repetition of what has been said before.
6:39 - I would like the sentence to clearly say that it is the user's responsibility to pass a communicator whose processes can share memory. How about changing it to
"It is the user's responsibility to ensure that the communicator comm represents a group of processes that can create a shared memory segment that can be accessed by all processes in the group."
Then we should say what happens if the communicator contains processes that cannot share memory.
7:10 - "as info key" -> "as an info key"
7:35 - MPI_WIN_FLAVOR_SHM is not defined in 11.2.6
Since the default allocation is supposed to be contiguous, is the intended implementation method supposed to be something like the following:
* wait for everyone to call the function
* gather everyone's local size; add it up
* allocate single, large shared memory
* return local pointers everywhere
On Aug 29, 2011, at 12:12 AM, Torsten Hoefler wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We just posted a new update to the proposal (thanks to Bill for the
> comments!) to the ticket at
> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/attachment/ticket/284/
>
> All the Best,
> Torsten
>
> --
> bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ -----
> Torsten Hoefler | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead
> Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC)
> 1205 W Clark Street | Urbana, IL, 61801
> NCSA Building | +01 (217) 244-7736
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-rma mailing list
> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma
More information about the mpiwg-rma
mailing list