[Mpi3-rma] Updated MPI-3 RMA proposal 1

[Pavan Balaji]

On 06/21/2010 12:05 AM, William Gropp wrote:
> Note that in this interpretation, proposal 1 is not a "bare minimum";  
> rather, it is a consensus collection of consistent extensions that  
> enlarge the space of applications that can be efficiently coded using  
> MPI-3 one-sided.  It will leave some useful features out and some  

I agree with this definition, and this is along the lines of what I was 
proposing -- a set of features that we have a consensus on, rather the 
"minimum set of features" each one of us thinks should be in.

  -- Pavan

-- 
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji