[Mpi3-rma] Updated MPI-3 RMA proposal 1

[Pavan Balaji]

On 06/20/2010 06:03 PM, Rajeev Thakur wrote:
> Are you refering to Accumulate_get :-)? Maybe it should be in Proposal
> 2.

Ah, that too. But I was referring to the fact that I don't think it's 
the "bare minimum". I think we need more for RMA to be useful.

> But, seriously, we need to present a united front at least in proposal
> 1. Otherwise the Forum will have no confidence in us.

I'm still opposed to it, but am willing to go along for the greater good 
:-).

  -- Pavan

-- 
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji