[Mpi3-rma] Updated MPI-3 RMA proposal 1
balaji at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Jun 20 15:24:14 CDT 2010
On 06/20/2010 03:20 PM, Torsten Hoefler wrote:
> We're not dropping it, we're just not forcing it all into one. The issue
> is that we have two people who seems vehemently opposed. If we lump it
> into one proposal 1 (the name is really bad :), then we don't give them
> the chance to argue against it separately. If they wanted to rally
> against it (and we had several rallies of this kind, just remember the
> const proposal or the dist graph stuff), then they would need to kill
> proposal 1 as a whole including all non-controversial things. I don't
> think this would be fair.
Each item will be discussed separately. So, if the Forum doesn't like
allflushall, it'll be dropped (not just proposal 1; dropped fully).
That's why I don't understand why proposal 1 cannot have it but proposal
2 can (or proposal 3 or proposal 15).
More information about the mpiwg-rma