[Mpi3-rma] non-contiguous support in RMA & one-sided pack/unpack (?)

[Underwood, Keith D]

BTW - I just took a look at the broad proposal and it may contain several things that cannot be done without a wake-able remote software agent. That argues for Keith's idea of an RMA operation which closely matches what RMA hardware does and a second one that brings along all the bells and whistles. Maybe the assertion for an application that only uses the basic RMA call or uses no RMA at all could be MPI_NO_KITCHEN_SINK (even more tongue in cheek).

That particular option naming might be misinterpreted to apply to a bit more of the standard than just RMA ;-)

Keith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20090916/40d48871/attachment-0001.html>